Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Those are not the same. I'm referring to two problematic things with US companies: in one hand sanctions, in the other political censorship based on "woke" biais. Some French politicians got/are being canceled by Twitter and Facebook for their political opinions. This is a big problem for democracy.


If your “political opinions” violate a platform’s terms of service, what do you expect should happen?


S/he is expexting exactly that to happen and thus is hoping for more European players so its not all US-values that are being pushed, i.e. glorification of violence and prudish shaming/banning of such normal things as breastfeeding.


I hate to say it: the same argument was made by the communist party. It is sad that people never learn from history. It does not matter who does it. It matters because it becomes widespread and it becomes the new normality and good luck fighting normality. In communism ( or nazism) the party was not always the coercive power. Sometimes your boss, your wife or your neighbour take this role.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: