Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Etheryte's commentslogin

How do you get the agent to stick to it without constantly rejecting tool calls with the same description? I've tried a similar setup a number of times and it tends to forget about this constraint very quickly.

The tool itself enforces the constraint. This is deterministic. If an agent tries to read a big fat file in root, it gets an error from that tool's implementation that reiterates the requirement.

I don't bother warning it in the system prompt anymore. It's pointless. I let it bump its head as required. A few hundred tokens and the agent is back on track each time.


If the model isn't following the system/developer prompts easily, you might want to try a bigger/better model, tends to mostly be about model quality if it doesn't follow what you tell it to. Besides that, conflicting directions in the system/developer prompts can lead to the model seemingly ignoring instructions too.

It's called C. With all the undefined behavior it's mostly deterministic!

Look, we're always telling our bosses to stop micromanaging us. UB is just the compiler telling us to stop micromanaging it!

> It's called C. With all the undefined behavior it's mostly deterministic!

With AI, all programs have undefined behaviour, regardless of language.


Sorry, C isn't mostly terse, it's __builtin_mstly_trs()

Right, because that's the only one. You're a bit rusty on your knowledge

I see what you did there.

Cumin always shows up on these lists, whether it's with heavy metals or something else. It's to the point where I've more or less just stopped cooking with it because I don't trust it to be safe.

Get yourself a dehydrator and try making it yourself. I've started doing this with my herb garden and the catnip I grow for my cats. They much prefer the stuff I make than the stuff from the store as much as I enjoy my fresh dried (oxymoronic??) herbs. I haven't tried cumin yet. We'll see how the peppers in this years attempt at gardening goes.

If this report is seeing spices from outside the EU containing contamination then there are organic options available, as I'm looking at my EU made (comes from France) organic certified Cumin.

How much heavy meals can be hiding in a pinch of cumin realistically? Maybe you should invest in a metal detector.

The problem with lead (and presumably other heavy metals) is that exposure is cumulative as it gets accumulated in your body so there really isn't a safe amount.

While that's true (we should generally avoid ingesting lead).. Lead also gets excreted reasonably quickly.

In other words it's not a reason to avoid a few occasional pinches of cumin.


I probably have a weird gene or something but cumin smells like disgusting body odour to me and any food that has any trace of it I cannot eat or I will gag

This doesn't happen to me with anything else, I'm not a picky eater and will happily eat literally anything else


There is a hint of that it’s not just you but you get used to it and don’t notice it anymore. It’s kind of how most cheese has a persistent vomit smell.

> cumin smells like disgusting body odour

You're not wrong. If you smell pure cumin (without any other spices or herbs), particularly if you grind and mix it with yogurt to make a salty lassi, you get a whiff of body odor. My kids called it "the BO drink".

It's a weird thing, but the smell becomes quite different in combination with other smells. It's an ingredient in many expensive perfumes, believe it or not! [1]

[1] https://www.fragrantica.com/news/CUMIN-Polarizing-Note-of-Sw...


They more or less did that during the bombing of London, children were evacuated to foster families in the countryside en masse. Luckily they came to terms with the fact that this was an insanely traumatic experience pretty quickly and reverted. It's literally less traumatic for a child to be in an active war zone than to be separated from their parents.

> It's literally less traumatic for a child to be in an active war zone than to be separated from their parents.

Unless they happen to go to war themselves, vanquishing an evil queen with the help of a lion and becoming kings and queens, and reigning for a long while themselves.

Those kids seem to mostly turn out alright. Small sample size though.


I'm not so sure you're interpreting the data correctly: 1 in 4 such children become "silly, conceited" adults, forgetting all the lessons they learned on their adventure; and 3 in 4 develop vivid visions that result in them getting killed by a train.

And far far worse outcomes for those children orphaned:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-27/child-abuse-royal-com...


One of them (Susan) gets really into nylons and lipstick and is basically damned to hell for it, though.

I think the part where she abandoned people, including one prisoner, to a murderous gang of con artists / burgeoning cultists is more relevant than precisely what she abandoned them for. I'm reasonably sure that my interpretation is not how the author (C. S. Lewis) interpreted this part of the story, though.

Also, she wasn't damned by the end of the last Narnia book (rather, she's expected to be damned, but it is not yet certain).


Unless the child is killed in said active war zone, which was the maximally traumatic outcome they were trying to avoid. Some evacuation was reverted, but there were also later waves; I don't think it was clear that it was overall the wrong thing given the very possible outcomes of heavier bombing or even invasion.

Well obviously dead child suffer no trauma.

it seems that at least according to the german wikipedia page about the topic in germany they came to the opposite observation. children who were sent away apparently suffered less than those that stayed in the war zones.

Does this apply to babies separated at birth though?

The trauma shifts forward in time, like debt.

This is simply not true? Or maybe I misunderstand what you mean?

I don't know if there's a way to say this without coming off as rude, but if the hardest thing you can come up with is podcast hosting, then maybe you didn't spend too much time thinking about hard things? If it works for you, great, you do you, but I don't think it lines up with the title nor the premise of the article even remotely.

Emdashes don't really tell you much anything these days tbh. Many languages use them regularly and those people often bring the habit with them when they write in English — me included. Plus I would imagine every major model has tuned them way down at this point due to the backlash.

In broad strokes, learning leads to better life outcomes just like brushing your teeth leads to better health outcomes, or any other example you may prefer. Brushing teeth is a chore so a child won't generally pick it up all by themselves without some nudging. If you don't do the nudging you're essentially letting a child be free, yes, but also willingly letting them end up worse off when they're too young to know any better. Learning is the same.

> just like brushing your teeth leads to better health outcomes

This is very context dependent. If you grow up surrounded by a typical western/industrial/post-industrial diet, then yes, it almost certainly does.

But you could also change the food environment.

Hopefully the analogy/metaphor that connects this to schooling is reasonably obvious.


I don't think this argument is logically sound. Your eating habits are something that you personally have fairly high control over and can change with reasonable ease/effort. Society at large does not have the same characteristics and unless you have the means to live outside of society, you do have to deal with its realities.

So... We need to go back to living in the jungle?

You go do that then. Enjoy your slow death from malaria.


Where did I say anything about living in the jungle?

The food choices having nothing to do with the jungle, but rather: regular, significant consumption of highly processed and most significantly sweetened foods. There were plenty of people in the world before the widespread adoption of sugar as cooking ingredient whose dental health would likely not have been improved by brushing, and they didn't live in "the jungle" but places like ... America, and Japan, and India and ... basically the entire planet.


Showing up in search results, or in this day and age LLM results, is still king. If your famous product is known as the ESP32, it doesn't hurt sales to spin other products off the same line. It might hurt clarity, glance value and many other things, but it will drive people to you.

Nearly every manufacturer does this though? It's often simply done in such a sleek way that customers don't even know it's there.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: