https://patents.google.com/patent/JP2013504542A5/ja

https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/biomedical-researchers-l...

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/absentee-owner.asp

Think about what allows the toxic management company to thrive, eg, by becoming the principal (part of it is an identity problem I pointed to in sibling comment)

The garden hose example is a good faith scenario but maybe it still feels icky to you because they arent the "genuine inventors" :)

How are they going to prove that? Put up a diff tree of their improvements?

That's an example of tripartite problem (innovators/IP-arbitrageurs/commercializers) that's easy to oversimplify to a bipartite one (NPE vs "practicians") by inadequate notation

https://archive.ph/8pZzW

https://archive.ph/zZIen

"Write in a way that makes your readers feel like you are talking to them."

Which seems like an epistolary version of one possible (maybe also better specified) paraphrase

  Code like you think -> Code so that the machine can think

Unless, unless you're AI?

1. Not foundational to curiosity, maybe?

2. Nudges humans to default to a single direction [of trade]. E.g. buy cleverness and sell bewilderment.

https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=tomhow

https://archive.ph/OI3S2

I've also heard that it's still common to address one's peers with -kun in parliament.

In GP's case it sounds rather quaint, but also endearing (like referring to a neighbor or a long lost schoolmate in the third person)

Pedantry: Takaichi is her father's surname. (I had to look that up, tbh)

("marriage is an institution")