Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lilerjee's commentslogin

I did not use LWN ago, and am worried the future of it.

It outputs content and the users read the articles. I think the value of the model is not big.

The most important knowledge and experience is from your own practice, thinking, experiment, and reality.

If the price is too high, many users maybe think it is not worthy of the price, especially because there are many free and useful knowledge on Internet.


No open mind, Cannot tolerate criticism, Only donwvote.

The future looks even bleaker.


LWN is a tightly run site for preserving the open source status quo hierarchies. They don't want discussion.


How to develop good culture? Firstly remove AI.


> Crypto has become the subject of my verbal ire so often because it is the apotheosis of the grift economy.

AI is replacing Crypto on the topic in some sense.


It's a test for business?

OpenAI wants someone or party to buy it?

It's too late, the sun is being down.


Too complicated and the price is very huge.

Fixing small errors and keeping going on maybe is a good business strategy.

The last result is probably what you said.


This is business secret.

No employee with professional ethics would tell you that (the real internal situation).

You can observe and analyze the reasons from some things.

Use it and tolerate the bad things, or on some time point go to other place (use other tool).


> This mostly solves hallucination

Current AI is like the film company producing TV series or movies

Your question is like a story outline. You tell the film company that this is the movie you want. The AI film company then searches for existing similar stories. If similar stories do not exist or details are missing, screenwriters use imagination to fill in the gaps (remember hallucination? It's just a makeup.)

So you cannot solve hallucination of AI


Indeed ! LLM are creative writers, not journalists. Relying on overfitting for factual accuracy in not tenable. I don't understand why grounded RAG with judges in not the norm.


Actually, I found the phenomenon too. I think there are two main reasons:

1. ycombinator supports many AI companies.

2. There are too many marketers from AI companies.


3. Many anti-ai articles are rooted in pseudoscientific emotional fearmongering.


I have the similar opinions:

We need to remember that the purpose of using tools is to solve specific problems and achieve goals. Having no tools, too few tools, or too many tools can all hinder the achievement of those goals. We only need to select a few useful, universal, and widely applicable tools. Unless there are necessary and sufficient reasons, we shouldn't easily switch to new tools.

For the tools we choose, one must become truly familiar with and proficient in their use, continuously customize, modify, and improve them, and strive to use them to the fullest extent, thereby significantly improving efficiency and productivity, and solving practical problems and achieving goals faster and better.


Rubbish article, waste of my time.

No confirmation for the title, rubbish arguments and logic.

> Good engineers have become more valuable because AI lets them move much faster.

Bad prediction. This is likely another AI marketing article.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: