His point is that it's not entrepreneurship, it's employment.

Because they even conflate pronouns with gender issues. You know, the words that substitute for antecedents in conversation.

I always point out the operational word is "premature".

I just searched for `for` loops with `:=` within and hand-fixed them. I found a few forms of the for loops and where there was a high number, I used regexp.

This tool is way cooler, post-redesign.

the sibling answer but with `-a` before command name, will display all path hits for a command.

I'm actually more excited about 1.26 mainly because of the streamlining of a lot of out-of-my-control systems. I love that I can new() an expression.

I rented one of these in the form of a Hyundai Sonata, and their lane follow is amazing. Included in the cost of the car, does radar cruise and all the rest. Free for the life of the car.

Gotta maintain The Machines of Loving Grace.

Or Democracy

Tom Cotton, (R) Arkansas is proposing a bill to shield households from increases in power costs in their region if datacenters are taking excessively in their grid sector. It *ALSO* allows for private power plants to bypass the EPA regulations public power grids are subject to.

So the argument is that Donald called his puppet Tom on the phone, spelling out to him a bill that once enacted will be sent 2 years back in time, causing it to have at least some effect on emissions in 2025.

I get it now. Thanks Donald.

Your first reply was insightful, but this one is not a thoughtful take.

Power consumption and emissions are already increasing, and any regulatory changes in 2025 are not factored in to discussion of those numbers. It’s more interesting to discuss what these changes mean when they are a factor in 2026 and on.

One can hope! Can we get national legislation please or is this just for Red States?

This was performance art.