Wayne Rooney lost his strength, motivation and creativity directly after his hair transplant. Some speculate the pills you need to take forever afterwards mess up your hormones. It's not worth it just to look good for women and "impressing" other people. His body turned into a fat womens body.
There are no pills to take afterwards, except perhaps painkillers. Some people who are balding chose to take finasteride but it's unrelated to the procedure itself.
It's possible, but finasteride doesn't cause weight gain or muscle loss. In fact, it slightly increases free testosterone due to less of it being converted to DHT. He probably just got older and became less active.
Yes, finasteride can cause a very slight estrogen increase (~15%) but nothing like bodybuilders who inject anabolic steroids for example (3x-5x+ increase). It's similar to the estrogen bump from gaining 10-15 pounds of fat. In any case, it doesn't cause weight gain or muscle loss.
Wayne Rooney, like many professional sports players who spent decades staying in top shape and motivation, can actually call it a day and that is the most reasonable and normal thing.
It’s a sad state of affairs when so many think math is about “rote memorizing formulas and rules like a robot”. That’s how math is taught through freshman or sophomore material for a somewhat ‘general’ audience. But real math is nothing like that - it requires far more creativity. You need to discover formulas and rules. You invent new rules and see what the consequences are. This all requires a great deal of creativity. Nothing “rote” about it.
If you don’t believe me, crack open a text on something like graph theory (that’s pretty accessible, and if you’re a programmer, you’re familiar with graphs) and read through some proofs. Or better yet, try to prove some theorems yourself. No amount of rote memorization of formulas or rules will replace the creativity needed to write these proofs. Doubly so for discovering the facts in the first place.
This seems like an intentionally reductive view on mathematics, however it is true it can be taught like so.
If you are interested, perhaps check out 3Blue1Brown on youtube, they manage to show some of the (very) real beauty in mathematics!
Edit: Also, theoretical computer science is a subset of mathematics, and considering where we are on the internet, I get the feeling you like computer science.
Human mathematicians are being exposed the same way the "artists" are. It was always about the money and to look clever, superior to other humans. Whether its robotically spending millions of hours drawing until they can put something together at the level of a chatgpt 3 or the rote memorization of formulas and rules. They like people to think it all came naturally and that its genetic and that they are special snowflakes.
Both mathematics and art are comprised of two phases, the first, technical one, where the novice grinds the skill and the second, the creative one which can only be achieved if you have the means (skill) to express yourself. What you described is the technical phase, not the creative one. There is intrinsic value to it that has nothing to do with money or cleverness, something that if you ever experienced it yourself even once, wouldn't need to be explained to you. Only people who never reach phase two have your stance. Artists and mathematicians who pick academia didn't exactly have great commercial prospects before AI was a thing, yet they still chose those paths because that's what having a real passion looks like.
>They like people to think it all came naturally and that its genetic and that they are special snowflakes.
No, they don't. Most of them are the humble people that know the value of cultivating a skill and when they do pride themselves it's precisely because they know the staggering amount of hard work and commitment they invested. Most of them are worried for unemployment and don't want all their work to be reduced to training data and on top of that not be given well-deserved credit for it.
The only thing being exposed here, is how much AI in its current form was being underestimated and constantly labeled as "not real/good enough intelligence". This was and still is a shared sentiment even among tech people. Can't really blame them for going through a bargaining or acceptance stage.
And since you also sound like the kind of person who thinks prompting can replace the "robotically spending millions of hours" of practice, I've got news for you: it cannot. You are about to learn the hard way the value of skill and human understanding because as much as capitalism rewards "impact" and "results", the market never values easy things.
And this matters to you? To be unique? So you care about what other people think about you and you must be special in their eyes? Cuck beta male mindset
