> With my regular lenses there's a part of the screen that's about a half dollar coin in size that's clear and in focus. The rest of the screen is every so slightly blurry.
I have two glasses that have lenses with a similar prescription. The older one has some basic lenses and anything outside the center gets gradually less clear towards the edges. The newer one has aspherical lenses and even the areas near the edges are quite clear. It wasn't expensive either.
The best lens I have used was probably a zeiss one but I'm guessing the full featured zeiss is probably quite expensive.
In my opinion the worst and most distinguishable downside of webp is the forced 4:2:0 chroma subsampling. On many images with bright colors you can clearly see the color and brightness loss without an educated eye.
On comparison [1] you can clearly see that the top right balloon has lost its vibrant red color. On comparison [2] the bright blue neon art on the center has lost its brightness.
Not to stir yet stir another debate but yeah, definitely not able to perceive the difference in either of the examples you linked. It would be helpful if that site let you drag the vertical comparison bar at least. On an iPhone 14 display.
I can see it in the second link setting webp to small in the orange reflections above the rightmost outside needle tree htms. ... oh, you cant drag it? ...
I'll pinch in with Tampermonkey's upsides compared to Violentmonkey.
Tampermonkey supports @connect [1] which lets you take an action whenever a script connects to a domain that isn't listed in its meta fields. Tampermonkey also warns you whenever a script modifies its @include/@match/@connect fiels with an update.
Yes, I was waiting for someone to write about it, but no one else did. I can see such a vast API that TamperMonkey offers in comparison to the competition. I don't have an immediate use of that extended API, but can definitely see using them in future.
My problem with webp is that lossy mode only supports 4:2:0 chroma subsampling which can make bright colors look worse in some situations. The sharp_yuv parameter helps but it can also introduce visible changes that did not exist beforehand.
I know that you meant something else with this, but the wording amused me as currently Firefox is the only up-to-date "portable" browser that lets you carry around your browser profile in a usb stick.
Anything with Chromium deletes your extensions, passwords etc. whenever you open it in a new computer.
Monitor website changes and get notification popups, email, SMS or push notifications on change. There are other alternatives that have the same basic functionality but I stayed with Distill as it is more customizable.
Other than Sublime Text I also like how Microsoft Office apps and Photoshop does it.
I press Alt+Q (it was Ctrl+F on PS), type something in and press enter.
If they have a search like that, then it doesn't matter where they hide the functionality.
I have two glasses that have lenses with a similar prescription. The older one has some basic lenses and anything outside the center gets gradually less clear towards the edges. The newer one has aspherical lenses and even the areas near the edges are quite clear. It wasn't expensive either. The best lens I have used was probably a zeiss one but I'm guessing the full featured zeiss is probably quite expensive.