Is any other citations of the work available online? Like how we only know about certain historical books/ works by someone else critiquing it or quoting a small passage.
After growing up for decades in Michigan and seeing the surrounding Great Lakes regularly, the oceans were a bit disappointing. Besides the salt. I knew it was salty but I wasn't expecting pickle juice.
Improving or standardizing the approach is all well and good, but if it's not natively integrated into MEW / MM / Coinbase Wallet / Phantom it's sort of irrelevant. Argent was the best attempt but they failed so bad commercially that they pivoted to a google drive recovery mechanism and changed their name.
This is from a recent update, and I'm on macOS. I had to re-download it, not just update from within the app.
This new version has tabs for ChatGPT and Codex. The ChatGPT tab seems way less powerful; Codex is basically a coding agent with a UI and browser built in.
Pretty sure this is the old Codex app with the ChatGPT tab bolted on. It's great in some ways, but needs work in others.
To try to guess at a plausible answer, any monitoring / remote management stemmed from wanting to keep an eye on temps over time. Freezers can go out of temp for only so long before its all bad.
Tada. It saves someone from making the rounds with a clipboard and writing down temps every X hours.
I agree its unneeded, just I can see the thought process.
Remote monitoring doesn’t imply remote management- one is sensible, one is a power trip. We are required to monitor our refrigeration and we did it with a distributed system of wireless sensor that upload to a cloud service. It’s independent and there’s no risk of loss from it.
The agent wrote the code that has a mechanism that triggers a file as a side effect. That file started the separate process, as it could have started any other binary.
The current coincidence is used to select a specific bit / core. Except it selects the same bit in every bank.
Bytes or larger words are made by stacking multiple banks together (18 in the articles case) All 18 bits would be driven in parallel by the driver over the X/Y wires to produce a coherent 18 bit value at the same moment.
The inhibit bit was so you could select which of those 18 bits (in separate banks) would be switched back to a 1, not selecting which bit across the entire bank.
ahh - I see where my dots weren't connecting, then.
I pictured having a current driver on each plane, so the data bits coming in would be enable bits for the current drivers. Which obviously means 18xQty current drivers.
I think you're describing having one big current driver for the whole job, and then data bits drive the inhibits to counter them.
I guess I'm looking through too modern a lens - pumping 18*600mA into the write cycle, plus (up to 18)*600mA into the inhibit, sounds insane to me (hitting 20A for a write) - but I can see that multiplying the current drivers may have sounded nuts in the 50s.
There are different ways of implementing core memory. The "traditional" way uses the inhibit line. The module I examined uses a "2½D" approach, which is what you originally pictured: separate current drivers for each bit and no inhibit line.
reply