Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're pretty easy to convince. Even if every single one of those results represented a person who jail broke their phone then there are still several times more people who haven't then have. I don't think the phrase "decisively rejected by the market" means what you think it means.


Translation: "I don't like the data."


what data? One Google query? Again, you seem to not understand how this whole "research" thing works. I really hope you're not a real life reporter because you're either being extremely intellectually lazy with your "argument" or you're trying to be purposely deceptive (again, in an extremely lazy manner). The only real data that's actually been provided shows the exact opposite of your ignorant "decisively rejected" quote.

It's funny when people spend so much effort trying to defend an obviously nonsensical statement. You were wrong. So what? We all say things that turn out to be incorrect, it's no big deal.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: