> And banning one strand of political speech is morally the same thing as banning any other.
Is this really tenable? I agree that all politics is ultimately backed by force, but that doesn't make all politic speech one and the same. A night-watchman state is hardly comparable to the CCP, for example.
Is this really tenable? I agree that all politics is ultimately backed by force, but that doesn't make all politic speech one and the same. A night-watchman state is hardly comparable to the CCP, for example.