> I did not mean to say that open-source software (broadly, MIT-licensed) and free software (broadly, GPL-licensed)
Sorry, but free software IS open-source software. I take issue with how you're presenting these. Perhaps a better term would be liberally licensed software, as opposed to copyleft.
Sorry, but free software IS open-source software. I take issue with how you're presenting these. Perhaps a better term would be liberally licensed software, as opposed to copyleft.