>> I don't know a single one who deliberately has said "there is a performance hit if they are remote, we should switch to in office to increase performance".
> Because you can’t. The decision to go remote is a one way door.
That's pretty hand wave-y. If there is money in it companies will do it. It wouldn't be much different than moving an office or factory.
> That's pretty hand wave-y. If there is money in it companies will do it.
Right. And if there was concrete evidence that this was the case then investors (especially controlling interest ones that I work with) would DEFINITELY being doing it.
> Because you can’t. The decision to go remote is a one way door.
That's pretty hand wave-y. If there is money in it companies will do it. It wouldn't be much different than moving an office or factory.