I'm really curious to know whether this view is at all reflected in the wider population outside of tech. For myself, being a tech-y person in SF, Google is good enough 99.9% of the time. I have a hard time believing there is a significant percentage of 'normal' people who think Google is a paint point in their daily lives, and good luck to any company who tries to break the "just Google it" habit that we've all developed over the past ~20yrs...
I've started hearing from non-tech people complaining about the spammy results in google results.
Feels like "trust" that they're actually seeing the best results are going down.
That said, many of these same people rarely actually google things outside of simple factual information that Google does okay at (e.g. height of the eiffel tower). Their experience of the internet is mostly through various social media filters (e.g. Facebook, TikTok, Pinterest, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit, etc.)
I also suspect this is part of the reason Google is giving worse results. Most of the actual content being generated on the internet is now occurring in various walled gardens that either pollute search results (Pinterest!) or don't show up (Facebook).
It's a tough problem for a company built on the open web that web mostly resembles a late-game Risk map with just a few big players.
>I have a hard time believing there is a significant percentage of 'normal' people who think Google is a paint point in their daily lives, and good luck to any company who tries to break the "just Google it" habit that we've all developed over the past ~20yrs...
To 'normal' people Google is the synonym for internet search and yea you are right nobody will be breaking the habit of "just Google it" anytime soon.
Google's lack of awareness regarding the power users is astonishing but a change needs to come from within Google not from outside because Google's top management just doesn't care what power users think.
All it takes for Joe User to change is one click to set the browser's default search engine - this is why google pays so much to Mozilla. There is not much that google offers that captures the user besides the trust that they are getting the best search results.
By now, Joe User has developed a healthy distrust/dislike of Facebook, but they stay there due to the network effect. Google has no such snares.
> All it takes for Joe User to change is one click to set the browser's default search engine
I'm pretty sure that takes a bunch of clicks and is confusing.
> this is why google pays so much to Mozilla.
Google pays Mozilla to fend off antitrust.
edit: Could Google disappear in a day? Maybe. People are still Xeroxing things but nobody is using a Xerox. Google have so much cash that they can pour into marketing that people would gradually drift back after any stumble, though. At the least they could get regulation passed that would be too expensive for newcomers to comply with, or that requires that Google be used as a middleman for some processing.
They have their family of apps tied to Google e.g. Gmail, Google Maps, Google Translate, Google News etc. That could be a drawback if you wanted to switch to a new search engine.
For non-English locales, Google sucks 99.9% of the time for popular queries since they allow spamming from big media outlets. A top result is literally composed of spammy SEO keyword content filled with a chain of questions in the article. So (I think) it sucks for 'normal' people in non-English.
It's interesting how books somehow retained a certain "quality" to them. For example each book has an ISBN ID. Maybe it's because of the publishing cost?
What if there was a premium Web where each website had an ISBN-equivalent, and the dates during which it was "in print?" And to get one published you'd pay a fee to a central register, such as $100.
Books have gatekeepers, publishing houses that put in work to market the book as widely as possible, get it reviewed in newspapers, arrange media appearances.
How many Kindle direct releases are going to get that kind of backing?
That's one of the biggest problems. You have to build something that is better than Google, at least to a certain subset of users that makes them ecstatic about the alternative.
So far all I've seen is shittier versions with terrible UI(you.com), or exact low-risk copycats going at it with the privacy angle.
3. while there are several experimental topics in the drops menu at top, the best examples is probably our jobs filter at 14M+ openings, https://breezethat.com/x/job-search-beta
Google is a great search engine! However, from time to time I am still enjoying other search engines when I am getting good search results for some queries, just as someone who has been in prison for 20 years enjoys the fresh air once released.
