Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So your argument is because the court regained hard earned approval in the past it is guaranteed to do so again?

Or the court can function perpetually against the public will?



His argument is that Congress should legislate these issues either through proper laws or constitutional amendments. Turns out 9 judges might disagree with the previous set of 9 judges. That disagreement swings both ways and in the absence of proper legislative action will become the law of the land.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: