Per the topic of this particular judgment, they agreed to hear a challenge to a non-law!
The Obama era Clean Power Act is not law!
This court went out of their way to steal authority thst congress specifically placed in the EPA and based their judgement of overreach on a non-law proposed bill from over a decade ago.
I allege that they are corruptly serving the Federalist Society agenda and deliberately dismantling environmental regulatory bodies for clear goals the Federalist Society maintains
And yet, in two of the examples given - the one under discussion, and the NY state concealed carry law - they took away authority from congress and a state respectively.
I would greatly disagree that it is up to the voters. It is only up to the representatives. Only states with binding resolution allows for voters to enact policies while major of states only allow representatives. There are numerous stances where the people fully support a policy while the major of representatives reject the policy and adhere to their political party and group think. If the voters had the power then we should be able to override legislation that the the current representatives supporting. I hear it all the time with representatives, we need the power to override the Governor, but never hear the people need the power to override the representatives and or Governor. Voting in new representatives has no correlation to enacting polices we the people want and demand.
United States of America is currently legislatively oppressed.
Most of the decisions reduce the power of the executive and the court itself and give power to the congress and states.
I might agree with you if they made abortion illegal nationally. But they didn’t - they said it’s up to the voters and their representatives.