Is that justification for suddenly breaking a system that was working
The fact that West Virginia v. EPA was brought up in the first place indicates that the system was not working, at least for some stakeholders.
Even if the system was working for most stakeholders does not mean it was Constitutional. The Court's job is to determine legality, but they need to wait until a case is brought before them, whether it's immediately or 10 years later. It's due process.
The fact that West Virginia v. EPA was brought up in the first place indicates that the system was not working, at least for some stakeholders.
Even if the system was working for most stakeholders does not mean it was Constitutional. The Court's job is to determine legality, but they need to wait until a case is brought before them, whether it's immediately or 10 years later. It's due process.