> >In the world we live in, this would be used to abort babies that don't pass the PGS to the vast majority of people who have this information.
> Are you sure about that?
So you asked this question to someone who said "In the world we live in", you actually meant "Are you sure that this thing that does happen in the world we live in will also happen in some unspecified nation that I live in".
I don't think that's what you were asking, but if you where, why would you ask that?
OK, well, I guess you're right that "our society" does not value boys over girls as much as China and India. I don't really see the relevance if you're arguing "no, sex-selective abortions will not happen."
>I don't really see the relevance if you're arguing "no, sex-selective abortions will not happen."
OP argued that there will be abortions based on sexual orientation as a justification for hiding research results from the public. As one of my counter-arguments, I argued that this isn't inevitable by providing a counter-example of lack of sex-selective abortions in most of the world (specifically the society I grew up in).
Who is 'we' here? USA? Canada?