>bladeless
>motionless
I always love it when articles are obvious shill pieces for a company.
It is a turbine system with a different mechanism of getting air to a turbine. The first thing you see in the video of the article are spinning blades.
The real question which the article should be asking is how they compare to traditional large turbines. (Which can stand unobstructed at great heights). How well this works in urban environments, where Wind is blocked/funneled by other buildings. Or if the claims over solar are actually justified.
Far too often there are articles about blatant vaporware (often fusion) where people just report sone companies claims as if it were self evidently true.
If you want to convince me:
- Show actual data. What did one such unit generate over a few month in electricity? Surely you have to know.
- Do not lie. The thing obviously is neither motionless nor bladeless.
The real question which the article should be asking is how they compare to traditional large turbines. (Which can stand unobstructed at great heights). How well this works in urban environments, where Wind is blocked/funneled by other buildings. Or if the claims over solar are actually justified.
Far too often there are articles about blatant vaporware (often fusion) where people just report sone companies claims as if it were self evidently true. If you want to convince me: - Show actual data. What did one such unit generate over a few month in electricity? Surely you have to know. - Do not lie. The thing obviously is neither motionless nor bladeless.