I think often someone tries to frame things into bets to pierce the layers of instinctual contrarianism and "have strong opinions weakly held" that often pervades internet discussion.
More charitably, reframing into a bet gives a relatively neutral opportunity of re-stating the discussion/argument to more clearly identify areas of agreement/disagreement (since a clear definition of the disagreement is crucial for forming a bet).
More charitably, reframing into a bet gives a relatively neutral opportunity of re-stating the discussion/argument to more clearly identify areas of agreement/disagreement (since a clear definition of the disagreement is crucial for forming a bet).