Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It’s a glass door! That’s the whole point of the question. You can see it from both sides.


I also think the way you posed the question is pretty weird and actively invites misinterpretation. If I approach a glass door and see mirrored text, that's not "mirror writing"—it's regular writing for people on the other side of the door. "Mirror writing" strongly implies that the text was written in mirrored form, rather than its mirrored-ness being a side effect of viewing it from "behind".

The inconsistency in the answers you posted is more concerning than the "inaccuracy", but we already know LLMs are prone to hallucinate when they should be asking for clarification.


I understand the frustration with how seemingly obvious the correct answer, is, but it seems like word choice might be a factor here. The word “mirrored” is a bit less accurate and may be a red herring than perhaps “reversed” though the difference is subtle. I wonder how both Gemini and GPT would perform if the word choice for that particular aspect were changed.


As eitally points out, your prompt leaves open the possibility that the mirror writing is on the other side of the door (which would make no sense). So technically you underspecified the prompt?


The mirror writing IS on the other side of the door. That’s exactly the point since it’s a glass door.

I thought of this question after coming across this exact scenario as I walked up to a glass door.

It’s not some pretend scenario. Often, when you approach a glass door, there is writing intended for the person on the other side, which appears to you as mirror writing.

I wondered if chat gpt could figure that out, and to my great surprise it could. That to me formed a new benchmark in my mind of how much of a world model it must have to figure that out.


The point of these AIs is that they don't need precise programming like a computer and that they understand real human language, which is imprecise but has general conventions and simplifying assumptions to make communication easier.


But the whole question is posed as a trick question, I’d at least consider it and think it normal for a human to do so.


It's not a trick question because it's very clear what the key thing to think about it, the mirrored writing. A trick question would be something that's trying to divert your attention elsewhere with a red herring.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: