Astrology is a thing with no substance whatsoever. It's just random, made-up stories. There is no possibility that it will ever develop into something that has substance.
AI has a great deal of substance. It can draft documents. It can identify foods in a picture and give me a recipe that uses them. It can create songs, images and video.
AI, of course, has a lot of flaws. It does some thing poorly, it does other things with bias, and it's not suitable for a huge number of use cases. To imply that something that has a great deal of substance but flaws alongside is the same as something that has no substance whatsoever nor ever will is just not a reasonable thing to do.
AI has a great deal of substance. It can draft documents. It can identify foods in a picture and give me a recipe that uses them. It can create songs, images and video.
AI, of course, has a lot of flaws. It does some thing poorly, it does other things with bias, and it's not suitable for a huge number of use cases. To imply that something that has a great deal of substance but flaws alongside is the same as something that has no substance whatsoever nor ever will is just not a reasonable thing to do.