Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Agreed, that stings. Its extremely visible & painful. I want to believe there was some intent, to make extensions that weren't such an extreme hazard, so that the Google Web Store could be better. But it's obviously just a massive regression in user agency, and miserable, and directly undoes so much of the good that was the web.

I still think this is, like, the one example. Its a bloody awful one though.



Chrome was never about user agency though. The ideal Chrome is to be an un-configurable window to the Web, hence the name (it is the window chrome).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: