8.75% surely? you need at least two digits of specious precision on that non-ran... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		ggm 5 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Is Your Bluetooth Chip Leaking Secrets via RF Sign... 8.75% surely? you need at least two digits of specious precision on that non-random number.

cozzyd 5 months ago [–]

More likely 8.333% I would think (1/12). The same probability of a broken clock yielding the correct hour.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact