It's incredible to me that this is their stance.
It also seems to directly violate "Do no evil" pretty frequently--effectively shutting down someone's livelihood, in this case.
They just lost a phone number on their cheap service. The fact that losing that phone number endangered someone's livelihood is not their fault.
It's incredible to me that this is their stance.
It also seems to directly violate "Do no evil" pretty frequently--effectively shutting down someone's livelihood, in this case.