Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So basically what happened:

1. Anthropic realized their models weren't enough of a moat.

2. They built tools so they could expand their moat.

3. People don't want to use their tools, they want their models, and use other, better tools.

4. Anthropic bans the use of better tools, taking advantage of their model superiority to try to lock people into subpar tools.

"I don't have enough of a moat so I'll use my little moat and pretend it's a big one" doesn't sound like a great strategy. All they're doing with this anticonsumer behaviour is making sure that I'll leave the moment another model works for me as well as Claude does.

 help



Kind of. Yes, they want you to use their tools.

I doubt Anthropic ever thought they would have a big moat just based on the models. The platform is just as important.

Claude code and Cowork would still be extremely valuable to Anthropic even if they didn't release them to the public.

Owning the harness gives them a ton of data they can use to tune the models.

This is a perfectly sane strategy even if it's a bit unsavoury to some technical folk.


> I'll leave the moment another model works for me as well as Claude does.

Isnt that a large moat in itself but you are claiming its not enough?


Apparently not for Anthropic, since they've been wanting to build a larger one by force. My point is you can't build a moat by forcing people, it defeats the purpose.

What are other better tools? I would like to use them

OpenCode, Pi, whatever Anthropic doesn't let you use with their subscription because they want to lock you in to their stuff.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: