Good analogy because they compete for patronage and talent to an degree, but (just like vim and emacs) the user can choose which tool is best for the job, including learning and using both at the appropriate times, so in a way they're perfectly complementary.
> "vim vs emacs" of the statistics world.
Good analogy because they compete for patronage and talent to an degree, but (just like vim and emacs) the user can choose which tool is best for the job, including learning and using both at the appropriate times, so in a way they're perfectly complementary.
reply