I am unsure of what you mean. I have no love lost for the author of that article: parts of that article are true but he seems clearly biased to the point of having included outright fabrications in other parts.
But, Gandhi is correctly spelt Gandhi in the article and not Ghandy or Ghandi as others often do.
Edit: Ah I see, the link spells it Ghandi. The article, however, gets it right.
But, Gandhi is correctly spelt Gandhi in the article and not Ghandy or Ghandi as others often do.
Edit: Ah I see, the link spells it Ghandi. The article, however, gets it right.