"I don't believe people on this site are too stupid to realize that, I believe they prefer not to, because they support the outcomes these rulings enact.
And given that, we are in a lot of trouble."
If what you're saying is true, then the same could be said if the rulings went the other way. Basically the whole system is an oligarchy and the winning side will claim legitimacy and logic, while the losing side complains about a lack thereof.
So what is the solution?
Edit: why disagree without discussion or providing the solution?
Stop tyring to do everything through naked force and pursue market solutions that people adopt because it's economically advantageous for them to do so?
Everybody who looks hard enough knows that neither of these things will happen and we know why. That people ignore it or pretend otherwise is the real problem at the root of this whole situation.
I am not talking about any particular political framework at all.
I am trying to point out that if you start from that premise you prejudice the kinds of diagnoses and solutions to any potential problem you come up with. Which is of course the exact reason that the parties who stand to gain so much wealth and power from the exercise are so desperate that this should be the default, and why to the extent there is a problem that might be solved, quick, easy and relatively cheap direct voluntary action solutions need to be hit with SWAT raids lest the power and wealth that might be attained from nebulous, slow, difficult and extremely expensive solutions which are by contrast pushed by force upon the entire planet.
And given that, we are in a lot of trouble."
If what you're saying is true, then the same could be said if the rulings went the other way. Basically the whole system is an oligarchy and the winning side will claim legitimacy and logic, while the losing side complains about a lack thereof.
So what is the solution?
Edit: why disagree without discussion or providing the solution?